Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

Retirees sue Weyerhaeuser over terminated health benefits

Reprints

Forest-products manufacturer Weyerhaeuser Co. violated earlier promises to its retired employees by first cutting and then terminating health benefits for several thousand retirees, according to a lawsuit filed in federal court.

Four retired Weyerhaeuser employees charged in the suit, filed Wednesday in U.S. District Court in Portland, Oregon, that Weyerhaeuser's action in 2011 to replace its retiree medical plan with a health reimbursement arrangement in which the company contributed just over $1,300 a year to retirees' HRAs, followed by its decision in 2015 to eliminate the HRAs, clashed with earlier commitments to provide coverage.

In 2009, for example, according to the suit, the company's top executive, wrote in correspondence outlining a new health care plan, that the company remained “committed to offering medical benefits to retirees.”

The suit, filed by the law firm Haglund Kelley L.L.P. in Portland, seeks reinstatement of the benefits consistent with those promised in a 1979 summary plan description document.

A spokeswoman for Federal Way, Washington-based Weyerhaeuser said the company does not comment on pending litigation.

Read Next

  • State top court denies public retiree cost-of-living raises

    (Reuters) — The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled on Thursday that retired public employees do not have a contractual right to receive increasing cost-of-living adjustments, a decision that is expected to save the state billions of dollars.