Help

BI’s Article search uses Boolean search capabilities. If you are not familiar with these principles, here are some quick tips.

To search specifically for more than one word, put the search term in quotation marks. For example, “workers compensation”. This will limit your search to that combination of words.

To search for a combination of terms, use quotations and the & symbol. For example, “hurricane” & “loss”.

Login Register Subscribe

News Corp. must face ad monopoly class action

Reprints
News Corp. must face ad monopoly class action

(Reuters) — News Corp. has been ordered by a Manhattan federal judge to face a class action lawsuit accusing it of monopolizing the market for in-store promotions at some 52,500 retail stores across the United States.

U.S. District Judge William Pauley said consumer packaged goods companies such as Dial Corp., H.J. Heinz Co. and Smithfield Foods Inc. may pursue their antitrust claims as a group, potentially boosting overall damages.

News Corp. spokeswoman Laura Adams said the company, which is controlled by Rupert Murdoch, is reviewing Thursday's decision.

The litigation is part of a long-running battle over News Corp.'s marketing operations.

In January 2010, the New York-based company agreed to pay $500 million to end rival Valassis Communications Inc.'s antitrust lawsuit over the newspaper coupon market.

News Corp. has an estimated 80% of the U.S. market for in-store promotion services, where it acts as a middleman to help companies promote goods through coupon dispensers, electronic signs, end-of-aisle displays and shopping cart ads.

The plaintiffs said News Corp. has monopolized this market since 2004 by locking up exclusive long-term contracts with retailers.

They said this anticompetitive conduct has forced them to pay artificially high prices to promote such goods as Dial-brand soap, Heinz ketchup and Smithfield's Eckrich hot dogs.

In certifying a class action from April 5, 2008, to the present, Judge Pauley rejected News Corp.'s arguments that damages would be too hard to measure.

He noted that the plaintiffs' damages expert estimated overcharges of 31% to 43% in the 2008-2013 period.

The judge also said "central questions regarding liability" for alleged supra-competitive prices were "susceptible to common proof" that could be addressed in a single trial.

John Briody, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, declined to comment.

Judge Pauley said Valassis is News Corp.'s only remaining competitor in the in-store promotion services market.

Valassis has also accused News Corp. of unfairly dominating that market, and is suing the company in Detroit federal court.

Heinz is owned by Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway Inc. and Brazil's 3G Capital, and plans to merge as soon as next month with Kraft Foods Group Inc.

Smithfield was bought in 2013 by the Chinese company now called WH Group Ltd. Dial is a unit of Germany's Henkel & Co.

The case is Dial Corp. et al. v. News Corp. et al., U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 13-06802.

Read Next

  • Supreme Court takes up Tyson Foods class action challenge

    (Reuters) — The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to take up Tyson Foods Inc.'s challenge to an almost $5.8 million judgment awarded against the company over worker pay at an Iowa meat-processing facility in a case that gives the nine justices a new chance to curb class action litigation.